TRANSFORMING LEGAL AID IN INDIA: CAN AI BRIDGE THE JUSTICE DIVIDE?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhai.v2.i1.2025.33Keywords:
Legal Aid, Access To Justice., Artificial Intelligence, Predictive Analytics, Digital DivideAbstract
Legal aid is essential in promoting access to justice for marginalized and impoverished sections of the society. Nevertheless, challenges such as an overburdened court system, lack of legal aid lawyers, and procedural complexities continue to hinder effective legal assistance in India. The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) has a transformative potential in bridging the justice gap by enhancing the functioning of legal aid, streamlining processes, and offering timely and competent legal information. The present paper analyzes the potential of AI-based tools such as chatbots, predictive analytics, and automated legal research in enhancing the accessibility and quality of legal aid in the Indian context. It also delves into the ethical, legal, and governance challenges that may arise due to the implementation of AI, including bias, data privacy concerns, and the digital divide. By surveying the global best practices and the analyzed legal aid mechanism in India, this paper attempts to ascertain the possibility of AI serving as one effective solution to make legal aid more effective and an avenue toward achieving a more inclusive justice system. The study concludes by providing recommendations regarding implementing AI in India's legal aid system while ensuring justice, transparency, and accessibility.
References
A Brief History of Legal Aid. (2023).
Abiodun, O. S., & Lekan, A. J. (2020). Exploring the Potentials of Artificial Intelligence in the Judiciary. International Journal of Engineering Applied Sciences and Technology, 5(8). https://doi.org/10.33564/ijeast.2020.v05i08.004
Abujaber, A. A., & Nashwan, A. J. (2024). Ethical Framework for Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Research: A Path to integrity. World Journal of Methodology, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v14.i3.94071
Ahmed, M. I., Spooner, B., Isherwood, J., Lane, M. A., Orrock, E., & Dennison, A. R. (2023). A systematic Review of the Barriers to the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare [Review of A Systematic Review of the Barriers to the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare]. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.46454
Ahtohob, В. В., Kharisova, Z. I., Kalimullin, N. R., & Abdulnagimov, A. (2021). Modeling Problems Legal Regulation of the Field of Artificial Intelligence. Iop Conference Series: Materials Science And Engineering, 1069(1), 012002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1069/1/012002
Angwin, J., & Larson, J. (2016). Bias in Criminal Risk Scores is Mathematically Inevitable, Researchers say.
Appelbaum, P. S. (2002). Privacy in Psychiatric Treatment: Threats and Responses [Review of Privacy in Psychiatric treatment: Threats and Responses]. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159(11), 1809. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.159.11.1809
Araujo, T., Helberger, N., Kruikemeier, S., & Vreese, C. H. de. (2020). In AI we trust? Perceptions About Automated Decision-Making By Artificial Intelligence. AI & Society, 35(3), 611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-019-00931-w
Authors. (2024). Artificial Intelligence 2024 - India.
Balan, A. (2024). Examining the Ethical and Sustainability Challenges of legal Education’s AI Revolution. International Journal of the Legal Profession, 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695958.2024.2421179
Chalid, P., & Rizqita, A. N. (2018). Existing Social Justice Choice for Underprivileged Society Members. https://doi.org/10.2991/iclj-17.2018.10
Chouhan, K. S. (2019). Role of AI in Legal aid and Access to Criminal Justice. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Contributors to Wikimedia projects. (2023). Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.
Contributors to Wikimedia Projects. (2023). Tele-Law Programme.
Dhani, J. S., Bhatt, R., Ganesan, B., Sirohi, P., & Bhatnagar, V. (2021). Similar Cases Recommendation Using Legal knowledge graphs. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107
Dyke, S. O. M., Dove, E. S., & Knoppers, B. M. (2016). Sharing Health-Related Data: A Privacy Test. npj Genomic Medicine, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/npjgenmed.2016.24
Ferrara, E. (2023). Should ChatGPT be Biased? Challenges and Risks of Bias in Large Language Models. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304
Gerke, S., Minssen, T., & Cohen, G. (2020). Ethical and Legal Challenges of Artificial Intelligence-Driven Healthcare. In Elsevier eBooks, 295. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-818438-7.00012-5
Goldstein, J. I. (1995). Alternatives to High-Cost Litigation. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 36(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1177/001088049503600115
Jin, X., & Wang, Y. (2023). Understand Legal Documents with Contextualized Large Language Models. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303
Jüriloo, K. (2015). Free legal aid – A Human Right. Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 33(3), 203. https://doi.org/10.1080/18918131.2015.1066143
Kalamkar, P., Agarwal, A., Tiwari, A., Gupta, S., Karn, S., & Raghavan, V. (2022). Named Entity Recognition in Indian court judgments. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.nllp-1.15
Kaomea, P. (2023). An Intelligence Coordination System Toward Creating the Super-Intelligent Law Firm. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1145308
Kasimov, A., Provalenova, N., Parmakli, D., & Zaikin, W. P. (2021). An Integrated Approach to Digitalization of Rural Areas as a Condition for their Sustainable Development. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 857(1), 12004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/857/1/012004
Kerala Judicial Academy. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Assisted Judicial Processes.
Lovell, J. J. (2024). Legal Aspects of Artificial Intelligence Personhood: Exploring the Possibility of Granting Legal Personhood to Advanced AI systems and the Implications for Liability, Rights and Responsibilities. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, 4 2), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.51483/ijaiml.4.2.2024.23-40
Necz, D. (2024). Rules over words: Regulation of Chatbots in the Legal Market and Ethical Considerations. Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies, 64(3), 472. https://doi.org/10.1556/2052.2023.00472
Nigam, S. (2008). Legal Literacy: A Tool for Empowerment. SSRN Electronic Journal.
P. S. C. (2024). Legal aid in India: Enhancing Access to Justice for all. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i02.14836
Pandey, A. (2020). Social justice, the Raison D’etre of Clinical Legal Education. Jindal Global Law Review, 11(2), 201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41020-020-00132-3
Plata, M. C. (1997). Justice for whom.
Queudot, M., Charton, É., & Meurs, M. (2020). Improving Access to Justice with Legal Chatbots. Stats, 3(3), 356. https://doi.org/10.3390/stats3030023
Rhode, D. L. (2004). Access to justice. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA70899476
Rodgers, I., Armour, J., & Sako, M. (2023). How Technology is (or is not) Transforming Law Firms. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 19(1), 299. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-111522-074716
Semmler, S., & Rose, Z. (2017). Artificial Intelligence: Application Today and Implications Tomorrow. Duke Law and Technology Review, 16(1), 85.
Torous, J., Myrick, K. J., & Aguilera, A. (2023). The Need for a New Generation of digital mental health Tools to Support more Accessible, Effective and Equitable Care. World Psychiatry, 22(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.21058
Urbani, R., Ferreira, C., & Lam, J. (2024). Managerial Framework for Evaluating AI Chatbot Integration: Bridging Organizational Readiness and Technological Challenges. Business Horizons, 67(5), 595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2024.05.004
Westermann, H., & Benyekhlef, K. (2023). JusticeBot: A Methodology for Building Augmented Intelligence Tools for Laypeople to Increase Access to justice. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2308.02032
White Black Legal. (2012). Evaluating the Impact of Legal Aid Programs on Access to Justice in India.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rochak Bansal , Dr. Monica Chawla
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
