RETHINKING ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION IN THE AGE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: FROM LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY TO HUMAN COMPETENCIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhai.v3.i2.2026.97Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, English Language Education, Human Competencies, Higher Education, Ai Literacy, Communication, Conceptual FrameworkAbstract
The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming English language education by reshaping how learners’ access, produce, and interact with language. Generative AI tools can now perform many tasks that have traditionally been central to language learning, including translation, grammar correction, writing assistance, vocabulary support, and pronunciation feedback. While these technologies offer significant opportunities to enhance learning, they also challenge the long-standing emphasis on language proficiency as the primary goal of English language education. This conceptual paper argues that English language education must evolve beyond the development of linguistic competence to prioritize cultivating uniquely human competencies that AI can support but cannot replace. Drawing upon literature in English language education, human-centered learning, 21st-century competencies, and AI in higher education, the paper proposes a Human Competency Framework for English Language Education that repositions language proficiency as a foundation for developing higher-order competencies, including communication, critical thinking, intercultural competence, creativity, collaboration, ethical AI literacy, and lifelong learning. The framework highlights the complementary roles of educators and AI in fostering meaningful learning experiences while maintaining the human dimensions of education. The paper concludes by discussing implications for curriculum design, teaching practice, assessment, and future research, arguing that the future of English language education lies not in competing with AI but in preparing learners with the human competencies necessary to communicate, collaborate, and thrive in an AI-driven world.
References
Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford University Press.
Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., and Rumble, M. (2012). Defining Twenty-First Century Skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (17–66). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_2
Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and Assessing Intercultural Communicative Competence. Multilingual Matters.
Canale, M. (1983). From Communicative Competence to Communicative Language Pedagogy. in J. C. Richards and R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (2–27). Longman.
Canale, M., and Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical Bases of Communicative Approaches to Second Language Teaching and Testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.1.1
Council of Europe. (2020). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment—Companion Volume. Council of Europe Publishing.
Creswell, J. W., and Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Deardorff, D. K. (2006). Identification and Assessment of Intercultural Competence as a Student Outcome of Internationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10(3), 241–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315306287002
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford University Press.
Erdem Coşgun, G. (2025). Artificial Intelligence Literacy in Assessment: Empowering Pre-Service Teachers to Design Effective Exam Questions for Language Learning. British Educational Research Journal, 51(5), 2340–2357. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4177
Hazarika, I. (2025). Impact of Consumer Analytics and AI on Inventory Management in UAE with Reference to UN SDG 12: Sustainable Consumption and Production Patterns and SDG 2 Zero Hunger in UAE. In 2025 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC) (1–8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEC64801.2025.11460353
Huang, B. H., and Yan, X. (2025). Generative Artificial Intelligence in English Language Education: Potential, challenges, and the path forward. TESOL Quarterly, 59(S1), S330–S344. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.70042
Huang, J. (2023). Engineering ChatGPT Prompts for EFL Writing Classes. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 5(4), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.58304/ijts.20230405
Hymes, D. H. (1972). On Communicative Competence. In J. B. Pride and J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (269–293). Penguin.
Idapalapati, S. R. (2024). AI Integration in ELT as a Disruptive Mechanism. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 12(1), 922–933. https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2024.12.1.0941
Kasarapu B. C. (2026). Generative AI-Enabled Micro-Frontend Framework for Scalable and Intelligent Enterprise Retail Applications. International Journal of Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management Applications, 18(5s), 297–309. https://doi.org/10.70917/ijcisim-2026-2708
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeiffer, F., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for Good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and Culture in Language Teaching. Oxford University Press.
Lee, S., Jeon, J., McKinley, J., and Rose, H. (2025). Generative AI and English language Teaching: A Global Englishes Perspective. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 85–108. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190525100184
Liang, W., and Li, L. (2026). Artificial Intelligence Chatbot-Empowered Critical Thinking: Voices from English Majors. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 42(3), e70258. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcal.70258
Lo, N., Chan, S., and Wong, A. (2025). Evaluating Teacher, AI, and Hybrid Feedback in English Language Learning: Impact on Student Motivation, Quality, and Performance in Hong Kong. SAGE Open, 15(3).
Long, D., and Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and Design considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (1–16). https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727
Mahrishi, M., Abbas, A., Radovanović, D., and Hosseini, S. (2024). Emerging Dynamics of ChatGPT in Academia: A Scoping Review. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.53761/b182ws13
Marjanovikj-Apostolovski, M. (2024). ChatGPT as a Learning Tool in an Undergraduate Advanced Academic English Course at Southeast European University. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 243. https://doi.org/10.22190/jtesap240131020m
Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., and Qiao, M. S. (2021). AI Literacy: Definition, Teaching, Evaluation, and Ethical Issues. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 58(1), 504–509. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.487
OECD. (2020). OECD Learning Compass 2030. OECD Publishing.
Parviz, M., and Arthur, F. (2025). AI Anxiety in English Language Education: A Study of Iranian EFL Teachers’ Perceptions and Demographic Influences. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 15(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.386135
Richards, J. C. (2006). Communicative Language Teaching Today. Cambridge University Press.
Salimi, E. A., and Hajinia, M. (2024). LLMs and Academic Writing in Practice: Exploring Participants’ Utilization of GPT During an AI-Assisted Course on Writing Research Papers. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5534554/v1
Sawangwan, S. (2024). ChatGPT vs Teacher roles in Developing EFL writing. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 14(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.361235
Susanto, D. A., Priyolistiyanto, A., Pinandhita, F., K. A., A. B. P., and Bimo, D. S. (2024). Utilizing ChatGPT on Designing English Language Teaching (ELT) Materials in Indonesia: Opportunities and Challenges. CELT: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching & Literature, 24(1), 157–171. https://doi.org/10.24167/celt.v24i1.11633
Tacelosky, K., Kasun, G. S., Shapiro, B. R., Liao, Y.-C., and Harris, K. (2025). Exploring critical AI Literacy in Language Education: A Case Study. Foreign Language Annals, 58(4), 966–994. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.70029
Trilling, B., and Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in our Times. Jossey-Bass.
UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137
Werdiningsih, I., Marzuki, I., R. D., Ivone, F. M., Basthomi, Y., and Zulfahreza. (2024). Revolutionizing EFL Writing: Unveiling the Strategic use of ChatGPT by Indonesian Master’s Students. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2399431
Yaman, N. D. (2025). Pre-Service Teachers’ Process of Developing and Using Content with AI. European Journal of Education, 60(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70277
Yan, D. (2025). ChatGPT vs Teacher roles in Developing EFL Writing. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.361235
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., and Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic Review of Research on Artificial Intelligence Applications in Higher Education: Where are the Educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, Article 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Saranyaraja Muthumaniraja
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
